Re: Star atlas or software
- From: movac5@xxxxxxxxx (Marty)
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:39:11 -0500
The software vs. printed atlases a sort of personal decision. Both have
their strengths. As for me, I like a printed star atlas I can sit on
the livingroom floor with and plan out a star hop with little acetate
FOV circles. As others have mentioned, the Sky Atlas 2000 is a good
atlas to start with once you've got a pretty good idea of how to find
the constellations. As you gain experience and start looking for dimmer
objects, you'll want a more detailed atlas.
I start out with a planisphere to see what part of the sky will be
in a good position. Then I pick out a few targets and find their
location on the old Scalnate Pleso atlas... (an older atlas, similar to
the Sky Atlas 2000,) then go to the Uranometria 2000 for planning a
detailed star hop. Finally, the Uranometria goes out with me under the
sky. I have a space in my observing box especially built to hold it.
Marty
.
- References:
- Re: Star atlas or software
- From: pemulvogue
- Re: Star atlas or software
- Prev by Date: Re: Star atlas or software
- Next by Date: Re: Tele Vue Review: Tele Vue on top!
- Previous by thread: Re: Star atlas or software
- Next by thread: Re: Star atlas or software
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|