Re: Starmapping software
- From: "OG" <owen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:07:07 +0100
"oriel36" <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159623480.331551.197660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
OG wrote:
"oriel36" <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159446401.883857.161550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
OG wrote:
"oriel36" <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159382942.492260.38450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The calendrical convenience of a 1461 day cycle broken up into 3
years
of 365 days and 1 year of 366 days was and remains a gorgeous human
achievement,so old that the further minor adjustments amounts to 10
days in 1582.As there is an alternate number of days every 4th
year,it
should give you a clue that there are two systems involved,the first
governs the creation of the equable 24 hour day
There is no natural 'equable' 24 hour day.
I am delighted that you agree
So why do YOU talk about the 'equitable 24hd' as though it exists?
You justify the return of a star in 23 hours 56 minutes and 04 secs by
falsely assuming that a location on Earth rotates to the face the
noon Sun in 24 hours exactly -
Oh I see. You completely fail to understand what astronomers think,
therefore you think they are mistaken.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Starmapping software
- From: oriel36
- Re: Starmapping software
- References:
- Re: Starmapping software
- From: OG
- Re: Starmapping software
- From: oriel36
- Re: Starmapping software
- Prev by Date: 3rd Quarter Update to LPOD index
- Next by Date: Re: MAN ON THE MOON Exclusive Video -- NASA Archives.
- Previous by thread: Re: Starmapping software
- Next by thread: Re: Starmapping software
- Index(es):