Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- From: pausch@xxxxxxx (Paul Schlyter)
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:13:32 GMT
In article <ehr9tt$1ei$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul Schlyter wrote:
Btw, the reason non-astronomy dorks would have noticed Comet Swan
a century ago isn't just because of the dark skies back then, it's
also because then people in general knew the constellations to a much
greater extent than today.
As an aside, I think "dork" has a more negative connotation than you may
be aware of. Originally (and still today, at times), it referred to a
peculiarly male part of the anatomy. Even used metaphorically, it's a
disparaging term.
:-) .... ok, let's say "non-astronomy honorablie citizens" then .... or
perhaps even "non-astrolomy patriot".... however, although "patriot" is
an honorable property in your country, elsewhere it may be judged
differently: in my own country it's considered old fashioned and perhaps
also a little ridiculous.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- References:
- Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- From: boo
- Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- From: Brian Tung
- Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- Prev by Date: Re: The Sun had Sisters
- Next by Date: China Telescopes
- Previous by thread: Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- Next by thread: Re: Comet 2006 M4 (SWAN) had brightened dramatically
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|