Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- From: AM <sctuser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 06:57:54 -0500
Chris L Peterson wrote:
however- this isn't a company I want to
deal with anymore.
And Meade is ? Ok... as if they didnt try to
get rid of CI through unrthical means either...
AM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- References:
- Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- From: gobbletwo
- Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- From: muddy
- Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- From: Shawn
- Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- Prev by Date: Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- Next by Date: Re: C11 collimation woes
- Previous by thread: Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- Next by thread: Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|