Re: Little Dipper
- From: KLM <mke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:43:45 -0600
Mitnick wrote:
"Curtis Croulet" <calypte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q9WdnUlxArcYUfbYnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Does anyone know of a specific reason why Ursa Minor is often called (inthe
U.S.) the "Little Dipper?" I'm asking if there's a documented historicalthe
reason. Yes, I know it looks vaguely like a "dipper," and it's close to
"Big Dipper," and maybe someone once thought that if you have a big oneyou
also need a little one. All of these are conjectural reasons. But I'mIf
wondering if there's an interesting first usage or documentable reason.
someone can offer a reference or link, that would be much appreciated.
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California
33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W
From what I can tell the first mention of the little dipper, on usenet was
on Mon, Jun 6 1983 11:49 am.
Uhhh, the world existed before usenet ? Some say.
.
- References:
- Little Dipper
- From: Curtis Croulet
- Re: Little Dipper
- From: Mitnick
- Little Dipper
- Prev by Date: Re: Little Dipper
- Next by Date: Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)
- Previous by thread: Re: Little Dipper
- Next by thread: Re: Little Dipper
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|