Re: analemma
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:24:37 -0700
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:36:28 +0200, Anthony Ayiomamitis
<anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
These photos are the result of two layers taken independently .. one of
the analemma (on a single frame) and the other of the foreground. They
were layered together in Photoshop.
Got it. I assume that the backgrounds were taken fairly close to the
analemma locations, however? A few kilometers?
I've been thinking about trying an analemma shot involving Pikes Peak. I
would set up a permanent mount so I could restore the camera to its same
location for each shot. But I'll do separate digital images and
composite all of them in PS. While I appreciate the dedication required
to get the entire shot onto a single piece of film, I see no real reason
to go that route.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: analemma
- From: Anthony Ayiomamitis
- Re: analemma
- References:
- analemma
- From: Mike
- Re: analemma
- From: OG
- Re: analemma
- From: Anthony Ayiomamitis
- Re: analemma
- From: Dale
- Re: analemma
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: analemma
- From: Anthony Ayiomamitis
- analemma
- Prev by Date: Re: analemma
- Next by Date: Re: Free 2007 Moon Phase Calendar
- Previous by thread: Re: analemma
- Next by thread: Re: analemma
- Index(es):