Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: "olli" <olivier.vdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Jan 2007 08:56:40 -0800
bratislav3162@xxxxxxxxxxx schreef:
Curtis Croulet wrote:
The C9.25 that sparked all of this is highly regarded by many observers.
It's a production line scope that provides very good performance at an
attractive price.
Curtis,
you see the problem here : "very good" is a subjective term; just as
"likely to get unnoticed in normal use". What is very good for someone
will be merely acceptable for someone else. We all have different
standards and expectations. The MEASUREMENTS on the other hand are
impersonal hard facts; no interpretation required, we don't have to
read inbetween lines.
That is why I am so enthusiastic about French page. And that is why I
am even more dissappointed by Sky and Telescope (who aspires to be a
leading publication) and their vague testing methodology.
I like S&T, I've been a subscriber for almost 30 years. I reserve right
to be critical of them :-)
Bratislav
Yes but if you say C9.25 is good , do you agree with the results only 3
stars?
Olli
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: bratislav3162
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- References:
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: bratislav3162
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: Dennis Woos
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: Curtis Croulet
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: Dennis Woos
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: Curtis Croulet
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- From: bratislav3162
- Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- Prev by Date: Re: Updates hi-res solar images
- Next by Date: Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- Previous by thread: Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- Next by thread: Re: C9.25 ciel et espace
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|