Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: "RMOLLISE" <rmollise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Jan 2007 15:18:36 -0800
Hi:
Intes advertised the MK66 standard model as "1/4 wave." They tended to
test out a bit better than that, however. The Deluxe was "guaranteed"
to be at 1/8 wave, and the few I've looked at tend to approach that.
What's the visual difference between 1/6 wave and 1/8 wave? Very little
to the point of undetectable for most observers under most condtions.
Uncle Rod
khobar wrote:
I've seen a couple of Intes MK66's advertised - one 1/6 wave and the other
1/8. The 1/8th should be better, but could someone give me an idea of what
the visual difference between 1/6 and 1/8 might be? Is there an obvious
difference in image quality? And would either of these be all that different
from, say, a Celestron or Meade 8" SCT or 7" MAK or even the Orion 150mm
MAK?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: M104galaxy@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- References:
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: khobar
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Prev by Date: Re: R. Gendler
- Next by Date: Re: Feb S&T. Another softball review of a scope
- Previous by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Next by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Index(es):
Loading