1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: "khobar" <pnixon18@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:45:26 -0700
I've seen a couple of Intes MK66's advertised - one 1/6 wave and the other
1/8. The 1/8th should be better, but could someone give me an idea of what
the visual difference between 1/6 and 1/8 might be? Is there an obvious
difference in image quality? And would either of these be all that different
from, say, a Celestron or Meade 8" SCT or 7" MAK or even the Orion 150mm
MAK?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Melweaver
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Melweaver
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: khobar
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: khobar
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Roger Hamlett
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Dennis Woos
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: RMOLLISE
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Alan French
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Prev by Date: Accretion disks
- Next by Date: Re: Orbital comparisons and the astronomical term 'periodic times'
- Previous by thread: Accretion disks
- Next by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Index(es):