Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: "Alan French" <adfrenchremoveallthis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:25:05 -0500
"Dennis Woos" <dpwoos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:12qdsd4ihaimpfa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
otherI've seen a couple of Intes MK66's advertised - one 1/6 wave and the
what1/8. The 1/8th should be better, but could someone give me an idea of
comparison.the visual difference between 1/6 and 1/8 might be? Is there an obvious
difference in image quality? And would either of these be all that
different from, say, a Celestron or Meade 8" SCT or 7" MAK or even the
Orion 150mm MAK?
Check out http://www.rfroyce.com/compimag.htm for an interesting
Dennis,
I have a poster from AstroQuest that shows a similar comparison through an
8" scope, with additional comparisons of various secondary obstructions.
I've done a fair of observing with good 8" and 10" scopes, and I don't think
either the web site or the poster quite convey the amount of detail that can
be seen under steady skies.
Clear skies, Alan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Dennis Woos
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- References:
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: khobar
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Dennis Woos
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Prev by Date: Re: The Unified Field Theory
- Next by Date: Comet McNaught NW Washington
- Previous by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Next by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|