Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: "Dennis Woos" <dpwoos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:15:41 -0500
I have a poster from AstroQuest that shows a similar comparison through an
8" scope, with additional comparisons of various secondary obstructions.
I've done a fair of observing with good 8" and 10" scopes, and I don't
think
either the web site or the poster quite convey the amount of detail that
can
be seen under steady skies.
Clear skies, Alan
I agree with you about the amount of detail shown, but I also find it hard
to directly compare detail in an image and detail seen through an eyepiece,
especially as I have been accused of having "averted imagination" by the
more visually challenged members of our club. As an aside, these sceptics
recently clamored for an eye doctor who was a guest speaker at a club
meeting to give me a contrast sensitivity test that he had with him. To
their chagrin, I scored higher than anyone else and above the "normal"
range, and even a bit better than my older teenage son who I know has
somewhat better visual acuity.
I would get the best optics I could afford, period. I have found that
superior optics are a pleasure to observe with, and are less susceptible to
bad-seeing/bad-collimation/bad-cooldown/bad-eyepieces/bad-karma problems.
Dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Alan French
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- References:
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: khobar
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Dennis Woos
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: Alan French
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Prev by Date: Re: finally mcNaught
- Next by Date: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Previous by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Next by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|