Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: "RMOLLISE" <rmollise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jan 2007 06:40:49 -0800
Hi Bill:
Thanks. I'm certainly aware of the difficulty of producing a good
figure in plate glass, but I'm a bit skeptical that this will be a huge
problem with the spheres on the Intes scopes. It should also be
rmembered that the wavefront error on these scopes is the product of
all the components.
Uncle Rod
William R. Mattil wrote:
RMOLLISE wrote:
Hi:
1. That's his opinon.
Hi Rod,
While you are correct that it is his opinion it is also true that in the
course of polishing a mirror heat is generated. That heat changes the
mirrors figure slightly. So it becomes problematic to get a good surface
without altering the figure. A rather decent glass pusher once told me
that he would work a rough zone/high spot by warming that spot with his
hand prior to working it.
It should also be noted that these are not spherical, or parabolic mirrors.
2, The Deluxe scopes didn't _use_ Pyrex.
Indeed.
Regards
Bill
PS: The last time I spoke to R.R. about a large mirror he couldn't
provide a zero expansion one due to problems in getting the blanks.
.
- References:
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: khobar
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: RMOLLISE
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: M104galaxy@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: RMOLLISE
- Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- From: William R. Mattil
- 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Prev by Date: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Next by Date: Looks like Comet McNOT for me :(
- Previous by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Next by thread: Re: 1/6 or 1/8 wave
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|