Re: 3 Planet Anomaly



On Feb 15, 2:40 am, "Martin Brown" <|||newspam...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Feb 14, 11:26 pm, Chris L Peterson <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:21:37 -0500, giannoni

<casagiann...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If 3 planets of equal mass are positioned at rest in space, and
allowed to interact, then interesting transient behavior will follow
for a time, BUT eventually 2 of the 3 will will impart a combined
"escape velocity" to the 3rd. The 2 then orbit each other and drift
appart from the 3rd to infinity.

What if the three are equidistant (form the vertices of an equilateral
triangle), or if the three are collinear (equally spaced or otherwise)?

With the restriction of initially at rest this will not work they
would sit at the corners of a shrinking equilateral triangle until
they got really close together and then spontaneous symmetry breaking
would catapult one out.

The OP said "at rest" not "in orbit around a common point." I would
expect them to fall toward the center of gravity until they collided.
Of course, if there's just a slight offset somewhere, then one would
end up being forcibly ejected from the system.

However, I reckon you can break this claim as stated by placing two of
the planets adjacent to each other at the start of the experiment so
that they will merge to form a single body of mass 2M well before the
third planet which is started from a long way off arrives. You then
have a two body problem and a planet mass M in a very eccentric orbit.

ISTR that if you are allowed to set it up one body weakly bound
orbitting a long way out from two bodies in a tightly bound circular
orbit can be made effectively stable for all practical purposes.

That's what I would expect as well, as long as the more distant body
was far enough that the two more massive bodies appeared
(gravitationally) more-or-less equivalent to a single body of the same
total mass.

I believe the opposite is also possible; you can have a single small
body orbiting very close to one of two large bodies that are orbiting
very far apart. All of the stable orbit moons of the solar system
could be taken as examples of this.

Austin

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can anyone draw a simulation of two orbiting planets?
    ... planets of SAME MASS? ... bodies do not necessarily rotate in the same direction. ... Don't know why opposite spins would affect the orbit. ... As for ellipses I would imagine the midpoint between "one" specific ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Theory of Everything that explains Gravity, Magnetisim, Ele...
    ... Gravity is the energy presure of space. ... Gravity is the gain in mass on one side of an atom, ... A "wave" in energy presure will afect the orbits as one orbit time may ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: radius of a free neutron
    ... atom cant be drawn on a 100 mile wide page with a sharp pencil. ... The chance you ever even hit a nutron orbiting a pit would be slim. ... You lack the mass to make a direct hit in a pit. ... It will role down and orbit its way down the pit. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Just Like 2 - Relative Velocity
    ... Earth -- to arrive at the place you want to reach at the time you want ... by shooting bundles of ore in the proper orbit. ... the O'Neil-Heinlein electric launch tube to start matter on its ... opposite force to what the freight did, That's fine, if the mass ratio ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: 9,81 and the "Expanding Earth"
    ... V*density = mass. ... EE claims the earth is ... really, when INDIA took off and crashed into ASIA, ... simplifying to examine a circular orbit by the moon. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)

Quantcast