Re: best image enlargement process/ algorithm?
- From: Stuart Levy <s_levy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Apr 2007 09:20:16 -0500
On 2007-04-07, Jayson Butterworth <jayson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just wondering what is now considered the best image enlargement algorithm
these days. I've been using bicubic for years, but surely something better
has come along. I have lunar and planetary images I'd like to enlarge and
the normal bucubic doesn't do a whole lot.
Thanks,
Jayson
It might well be "greycstoration" -- google for that, or:
http://www.greyc.ensicaen.fr/~dtschump/greycstoration/
There are several modes for use of this algorithm, including
resizing (which it does at least as well as cubic interpolation)
and "inpainting" -- trying to smoothly reconstruct missing
portions of an image, as from bad pixels. It's being
used in at least the latter sense by someone working
on the Chandra project, who mentioned it on the astro-viz
mailing list recently.
The "demonstrations" section on the page is pretty impressive.
Stuart (who has no connection with the above, except for
being pretty impressed by it)
.
- References:
- best image enlargement process/ algorithm?
- From: Jayson Butterworth
- best image enlargement process/ algorithm?
- Prev by Date: New type of Dobsonian tracking platform?
- Next by Date: Re: Meade wins suit
- Previous by thread: Re: best image enlargement process/ algorithm?
- Next by thread: Still happy with your 12" Lightbridge?
- Index(es):