Re: what has happened to people
- From: oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Apr 2007 03:05:07 -0700
On Apr 24, 6:57 pm, AustinMN <tacooper...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 23, 3:20 pm, oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Call me what you will but as a human who lives by the daily cycle of
the Earth,I have enough intelligence to recognise the human devised
principle of the 24 hour cycle as opposed to the variations in the
natural cycle,how they mesh and seperate.Looking at the replies so far
not one person affirms what most of the world already knows in respect
to clocks, axial rotation summed up in the 24 hour/360 degree
correlation.
Like it or not, either:
1) The earth rotates more than 360 degrees in 24 hours, or
2) The entire universe revolves around the sun once a year.
There are no other alternatives. None.
Which one do you believe?
Austin
It is not a question of what I do and do not believe,the central
Equation of Time principles which hold together the creation of the
equable 24 hour day and its heliocentric adaption to
clocks,terrestrail geography and longitudes as a 24 hour/360 degree
correlation dictate what works and what does not.
The idea that a 1461 day calendrical cycle split into 3 years of 365
days and 1 year of 366 days can be used to justify the daily and
annual motions of the Earth ,the conception contained in Flamsteed's
statement ,is probably the most controversial error in all astronomy -
"... our clocks kept so good a correspondence with the Heavens that I
doubt it not but they would prove the revolutions of the Earth to be
isochronical... " John Flamsteed 1676
In two paragraphs you have the basics, the correct construction of a
timekeeping system , its adaption to the Copernican principles for
axial and orbital motion and the later error where Flamsteed jumped
the tracks and created a false 23 hours 56 minutes 04 second
correlation which introduces celestial sphere geometry into
heliocentric reasoning.
The title of this thread is apt,to understand climatology it is
neccessary to modify the Copernican reasons for the seasons using the
motions and orientations of the Earth and without a sincere effort and
discussion on the error created in the late 17th century which in turn
led to the scaffolding for other concepts,that modification cannot go
ahead.No doubt those who consider astronomy to be an exercise in
magnification,and they comprise the vast majority here,will clamor to
retain the convenience of the Ra/Dec system but the price is far too
great for the rest of humanity.
To be an astronomer is to recognise that our existence is conditioned
by the cycles of the Earth whether it is the daily,annual or longer
term cycles,to be a really good astronomer is to provide more details
as to how those cycles mesh and seperate.Tying the motions of the
Earth to constellational geometry is the most disasterous way to begin
and especially axial rotation so presently it is the absence of
astronomers rather than the presence of constellational astrologers
which proves to be the great problem.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what has happened to people
- From: AustinMN
- Re: what has happened to people
- References:
- what has happened to people
- From: oriel36
- Re: what has happened to people
- From: MDA
- Re: what has happened to people
- From: oriel36
- Re: what has happened to people
- From: AustinMN
- what has happened to people
- Prev by Date: MOON - Apr 27, 07
- Next by Date: Re: what has happened to people
- Previous by thread: Re: what has happened to people
- Next by thread: Re: what has happened to people
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|