Re: Dark fantasies?
- From: oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 May 2007 05:36:31 -0700
On May 4, 9:52 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris.B wrote:
Why couldn't dark matter and dark energy be "leakage" across the
boundary with another dimension (or dimensions)?
To date there is no evidence for and extra dimensions or other
universes for that matter.
History of the Universe from This Week's Finds in Mathematical
Physics (Week 196) -- First of all, we only "know" anything about
the world on the basis of various assumptions. If our assumptions
turn out to be wrong, our "knowledge" may turn out to be wrong too.
Even worse, our favorite concepts may turn out to be meaningless, or
meaningful only under some restrictions.
So, when we talk about what happened in the first microsecond after
the Big Bang, we're not claiming absolute certainty. Instead, we're
using various widely accepted assumptions about physics to guess what
happened. Given these assumptions, the concept of "the first
microsecond after the Big Bang" makes perfect sense. But if these
assumptions are wrong, the whole question could dissolve into
meaninglessness. That's just a risk we have to run. What are these
assumptions, exactly? They include:
1. General Relativity
2. Standard Model of particle physics
supplemented by
3. Dark Energy (a non zero cosmological constant)
4. Dark Matter (electromagnetic non interaction)
Assumptions 3 and 4 are the ones most people like to worry about,
because our only evidence for them comes from cosmological
observations, and if they're true, they probably require some sort of
modification of the Standard Model. But if we don't make these
assumptions, our model of cosmology just doesn't work... while if we
*do*, it seems to work quite well. In fact, the WMAP experiment gives
a lot of new evidence that it works surprisingly well.
GTR fruitful tool to map Dark Matter!
Scientists Map Dark Matter, Prove Einstein Right
http://www.space.com/news/cosmic_shear_000512.html
Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404175
Dark Matter -- One Mystery Solved (Update)
http://www.physorg.com/news7058.html
Until recently cosmologists could not explain why
elliptical galaxies did not appear to have dark matter
haloes surrounding them, which is known to exist in other
types of galaxies. Analyzing data from a simulation
performed on one of the most advanced supercomputers in
the world, an Israeli cosmologist showed that the existing
model of elliptical galaxies was wrong, proving that dark
matter was there all along.
See:http://www.physorg.com/news7058.html
Dark energy,dark matter or dark anything are just the end products of
the empirical approach to astronomy,and catastrophic approach at
that.The appreciation of the maginficence of the great astronomical
cycles from axial rotation,heliocentric orbital motion ,galactic
orbital motion and any other cycle we participate in are within the
capabilities of everyone here who looks out into the celestial arena
but are lost in the babble of exotic 'dark' notions which exist only
in the imagination of people who care about meaningless equations
rather than physical considerations.
The stage is set for everyone here to appreciate the clear distinction
between the brilliant Western astronomical insights and the hideous
17th century mutations which give rise to conceptual monsters like
'dark' solutions,monsters that originate from the false Newtonian
approach to retrogrades.
The 24 hour/360 degree correlation as a heliocentric affirmation of
the correct Copernican approach to retrogrades and their resolution
stand opposite the false 23 hour 56 minute correlation of Flamsteed
allied with the false Newtonian approach to retrogrades and their
resolution.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0112/JuSa2000_tezel.gif
Those images rendered into time lapse footage of the Earth overtaking
the slower forward outer planets of Jupiter and Saturn awakes
astronomy from 3 centuries of the stony silence of celestial sphere
astrology.You can forget not only your 'dark' solutions and the
exotic 20th century science fiction concepts and you can even forget
the original terrestrial ballistics agenda applied to planetary motion
by Newton for none of it ever worked astronomically,observationally
and bottom line.
Your magnification /theortical cult will bet that people are too
indifferent and too stupid to know the difference but I assure you
that I have seen the interest of people in their almost lost
astronomical heritage,the 'Longitude story' being one of the first
signs of recovery of the great astronomical principles.
.
- References:
- Dark fantasies?
- From: Chris.B
- Re: Dark fantasies?
- From: Sam Wormley
- Dark fantasies?
- Prev by Date: Re: New Televue Eyepice Design
- Next by Date: Re: 4 inch reflector can't resolve Mars at all
- Previous by thread: Re: Dark fantasies?
- Next by thread: Re: Dark fantasies?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
