Re: 4 inch reflector can't resolve Mars at all

In article <1178842877.144621.36130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<wsnell01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To obtain tracking with all but the smallest scopes often seems to
double the cost of the instrument, conservatively.

It will probably double the cost even for the smallest scopes: try to
buy a toy scope at some department store, then buy an equatorial mounting
with a clock drive for that scope.... I don't think cost doubling is
enough in that case.

Or for the same outlay you might get about half the aperture with a
scope that tracks.

Comparing a clock-driven 4-inch with an 8-inch Dob, by the end of the
night, you will have seen more detail in the larger scope. No matter
how long you stare at the perfectly centered image in the smaller,
clock-driven, scope, you will not, ultimately see as much as you would
through the larger Dob.

Doesn't the cost of a scope generally increase more than the aperture?
So that a scope with twice the aperture will cost more than twice as
much?

Otherwise giant scopes would be quite affordable - so that instead of
25 people each buying an 8-inch scope of their own, they could instead
join and together buy, say, the 200-inch Hale telescope. If 50 people
joined, they could buy one of the Keck telescopes. Wouldn't that be
something? ;-)

Earlier I've heard estimates that the cost of a scope is apporimately
proportional to something between the square and the cube of the aperture,
and that sounds more reasonable to me. If the cost rises as the cube
of the aperture, then some 125,000 instead of just 50 potential buyers
of personal 8-inch scopes would have to join forces to afford the Keck.

"But giant scopes also have an observatory built around them!", I hear
you object. True, but people buy personal observatories around their
8-inch scopes too. And the cost of buildings will also increase
faster than their physical size.

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 4 inch reflector cant resolve Mars at all
    ... double the cost of the instrument, ... Astrophysics mount - or a Questar OTA on an EQ-1, ... scope that tracks. ... comparable to Orion's 8-inch f/5 equatorials. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 4 inch reflector cant resolve Mars at all
    ... It will probably double the cost even for the smallest scopes: ... OTOH an 8-inch Dob is available for around $360, ... scope that tracks. ... Doesn't the cost of a scope generally increase more than the aperture? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 4 inch reflector cant resolve Mars at all
    ... It will probably double the cost even for the smallest scopes: ... equatorial mount seems to account for about half the cost of a - ... scope that tracks. ... Doesn't the cost of a scope generally increase more than the aperture? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Celestron NexStar 80 vs Firstscope 76
    ... >I never said to beat DOB on planets, ... is qualitatively, not quantatively, and it is at a much higher cost per inch ... performer than the 6" OA, which is in turn a better performer than the 8" F6 ... Anyone who has used the three scopes I just listed, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: General comment
    ... The SMZ-1000 is a stereoscopic zoom microscope ... buy a second hand scope on eBay ... If you want low quality, it will be low cost. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)