Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur

oriel36 wrote:
On May 15, 5:41 am, "Martin R. Howell"
<martinhow...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:48:35 -0700, Martin R. Howell wrote:
Lots of people have been asking for a moderated sci.astro.amateur.


The evolution of an astronomy forum is something else,it begins in
bright and breezy ideals and ends in something like this -

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php?t=30979&page=9

Killfile,don't read or whatever ,at least the participants of
sci.astro.amateur stand a chance to retain their individuality and can
squeek out an protest or objection occasionally.

Moderation has killed some newsgroups but having the moderation done out of band as Martin is doing brings out all the positives of moderation without the negative destroying the base newsgroup.



As a Christian,my business has been to protect and promote my
astronomical heritage in an era which is distinctly astrologically
dominant .


Ironic that you support something, Christianity, which is just as ridiculous as astrology.

Greg

--
The ticket*** Tax Tracker:
http://www.ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html

Dethink to survive - Mclusky
.

Quantcast