Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- From: "G.T." <getnews1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:02:40 -0700
Martin R. Howell wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:14:46 -0700, G.T. wrote:
Moderation has killed some newsgroups but having the moderation done out of band as Martin is doing brings out all the positives of moderation without the negative destroying the base newsgroup.
Thanks, Greg. If I didn't truly believe in the potential benefits to members of the traditional s.a.a. that Moderated sci.astro.amateur stands to offer, then I wouldn't waste my time on the project. We have about 20 members at this time with more slowly coming on. While involvement by membership is low at this point, I continue to try to improve the site and to keep it "seeded" with my own entries to give those members checking in (or guests dropping by) something fresh to view.
I don't know how many of you have tried the trim yet funcional and informative flash planetarium at Moderated sci.astro.amateur but when you do you'll discover a neat little "grab 'n go" planetarium. . .complete with a nightvision display option.
Cool. I'll have to start paying more attention.
Greg
--
The ticket*** Tax Tracker:
http://www.ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html
Dethink to survive - Mclusky
.
- References:
- Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- From: Martin R. Howell
- Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- From: oriel36
- Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- From: G.T.
- Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- From: Martin R. Howell
- Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- Prev by Date: Re: Universes, was Re: Venus- why not a good planet to view?
- Next by Date: Re: Which webcam/imagers should I buy?
- Previous by thread: Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- Next by thread: Re: Moderated sci.astro.amateur
- Index(es):