Re: New double star and binary star site
- From: Dr J R Stockton <jrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:46:20 +0100
In sci.astro.amateur message <857a4$46b376cf$4212a552$24734@xxxxxxxxxxxx
, Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:41:36, Greg Crinklaw<theskyhoundyoureye@xxxxxxxxx> posted:
Dr J R Stockton wrote:
In sci.astro.amateur message <1186076075.624426.92040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
groups.com>, Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:34:35, ukastronomy <martin_piers_nichols
on@xxxxxxxxxxx> posted:
I should also have pointed out that the name of the star gives aOnly of where it was. An honest vendor would
clear
indication of the position.
J011251.46+141957.6 = 01h 12m 51.46s +14d 19m 57.6s
(a) state the Proper Motion of the star,
(b) keep track of it, so as not to sell it twice,
(c) Adjust for changes of Epoch and coordinates.
What's a typical Proper Motion for a saleable star, per year?
Nobody said anything about selling stars.
Oh yes they did. though it may have been in another thread or group.
--
(c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links;
Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- References:
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- From: ukastronomy
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- From: Dr J R Stockton
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: New double star and binary star site
- Prev by Date: Re: Astro Cruising
- Next by Date: Re: Celestron Pacific Orange C8 telescope (1979)
- Previous by thread: Re: New double star and binary star site
- Next by thread: Re: New double star and binary star site
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|