Re: Ironic SAA
- From: oriel36 <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:56:11 -0700
On Aug 26, 5:05 pm, Greg Crinklaw <theskyhoundyour...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The irony I see is that since the sporge flood ended it seems to me that
the signal to noise on SAA has seldom been higher.
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing:http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://comets.skyhound.com
To reply take out your eye
Now that you have all congratulated yourselves,start to bring up any
astronomical topic beyond magnification and optics which is a very
limited idea of astronomers and astronomy.
I do not bother to read any of your posts,they are just from an
individual who has a computer program based on an astrological
framework and the 1461 day calendrical cycle.If you ever get around to
realising that trying to fit 4 annual orbital cycles of the Earth into
a calendar cycle based on 3 years of 365 days and 1 year of 366 days
is a hopl;ess waste of effort then you could probably find yourself
doing something useful but as it is,you are just another sour
indiovidual with a cartoon view of the Earth's motions derived via
Flamsteed.
Sorry.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: allisonki
- Re: Ironic SAA
- References:
- Ironic SAA
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Ironic SAA
- Prev by Date: Re: HAL
- Next by Date: Re: "Good... Morning...SAA"
- Previous by thread: Re: Ironic SAA
- Next by thread: Re: Ironic SAA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
