Re: Ironic SAA
- From: Greg Crinklaw <theskyhoundyoureye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:22:44 -0600
Margo Schulter wrote:
What strikes me is that from either an observational or theoretical
point of view, the precise conventions we use for timekeeping -- or
RA and Dec or whatever -- are pretty provincial matters compared to
the scale of the universe, or even of our own Milky.
Of course they are, as they must always be. In fact it is the very idea of a universal system of coordinates or timekeeping that is "provincial." That is is childlike error that Gerald--who clearly suffers from a serious metal illness--is making.
Where is the center of the Universe? Wherever the observer is standing. What time is it, truly? Whatever time the observer thinks it is. Ask a different observer, get a different answer. That is the true universal truth--that there is no such thing as a universal time or coordinate frame of reference.
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://comets.skyhound.com
To reply take out your eye
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: oriel36
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: KRP
- Re: Ironic SAA
- References:
- Ironic SAA
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: oriel36
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: allisonki
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: Margo Schulter
- Ironic SAA
- Prev by Date: Re: Ironic SAA
- Next by Date: Re: Propane vs. Acetylene (Hey, Ernie)
- Previous by thread: Re: Ironic SAA
- Next by thread: Re: Ironic SAA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|