Re: Ironic SAA
- From: KRP <wre@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:53:56 -0500
Greg Crinklaw wrote:
Margo Schulter wrote:
What strikes me is that from either an observational or theoretical
point of view, the precise conventions we use for timekeeping -- or
RA and Dec or whatever -- are pretty provincial matters compared to
the scale of the universe, or even of our own Milky.
Of course they are, as they must always be. In fact it is the very idea
of a universal system of coordinates or timekeeping that is
"provincial." That is is childlike error that Gerald--who clearly
suffers from a serious metal illness--is making.
He knows exactly what he's doing. All for affect.
Where is the center of the Universe? Wherever the observer is standing.
What time is it, truly? Whatever time the observer thinks it is. Ask
a different observer, get a different answer. That is the true
universal truth--that there is no such thing as a universal time or
coordinate frame of reference.
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://comets.skyhound.com
To reply take out your eye
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: oriel36
- Re: Ironic SAA
- References:
- Ironic SAA
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: oriel36
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: allisonki
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: Margo Schulter
- Re: Ironic SAA
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Ironic SAA
- Prev by Date: Re: Propane vs. Acetylene (Hey, Ernie)
- Next by Date: Re: Google Sky
- Previous by thread: Re: Ironic SAA
- Next by thread: Re: Ironic SAA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|