Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: Quadibloc <jsavard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:47:13 -0700
oriel36 wrote:
I enjoy taking pretensious freaks apart so lets see how you stand up .
From your ill-informed website -
"The Second is now defined, in SI, by the physics of atoms, and no
longer by the rotation of the Earth.
For the UTC time scale, the addition or subtraction of Leap Seconds
accommodates the discrepancy in rate, which in 2001 was about 1 ms per
day or 0.01 ppm. The UTC day thereby tracks the averaged rotation of
the Earth with respect to the Earth-Sun line.
A constant rate of Leap Seconds would accommodate a constant averaged
Earth rotation time differing from the nominal 86400 SI seconds.
Variations in the Leap Second rate accommodate changes in the Earth's
averaged rotation rate.
Long-term, the Earth's mean rotation slows by about 7 ms / year /
year, largely because of the drag of sea-tides.
Leap Seconds occur simultaneously, world-wide, at UTC midnight.
Leap Seconds were introduced in principle at 1972.0 UTC; the first one
was 1972-06-30 23:59:60 UTC"
http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/leapsecs.htm
The only 'leaps seconds' that are acceptable in respect to the axial
cycle are from the dignified,do you hear this,the dignified Equation
of Time system which resets the 24 hour clock cycle to natural
noon.
Unfortunately, the SI seconds we use in our electronic devices are the
wrong length even for the undignified average 24 hour day, and so we
need "leap seconds" to make up the error with that.
And his web site was very accurately informed about those leap seconds
that are in actual current use. Leaping back and forth every year to
stay with the sundial is not worth the bother, but avoiding a long-
term cumulative error because our second is the wrong size is needed.
John Savard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: Dr J R Stockton
- Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: oriel36
- Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- References:
- Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: John Savard
- Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: Margo Schulter
- Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: tony_flanders
- Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: Dr J R Stockton
- Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- From: oriel36
- Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- Prev by Date: The Ethos is Coming!
- Next by Date: Re: The Ethos is Coming!
- Previous by thread: Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- Next by thread: Re: Truly Offensive Bad Astronomy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|