Re: Something new
- From: oriel36 <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 05:55:26 -0700
On Sep 15, 1:10 pm, Quadibloc <jsav...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
oriel36 wrote:
If this is inhuman or an injustice I do not know,it is not often that
a new insight can be appropriated with such speed but judging what
what your kind did to John Harrison,to the works of Huygens,Copernicus
and Kepler,it is not surprising even as it is disapoointing.
It might also be noted that I would hardly steal your idea in such a
way as to leave on Google Groups a permanent record of my perfidy!
John Savard
The insight is for the expansive person,one who can match what the
motions are dictating and interpret them correctly -
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/11/images/uranus_5year.jpg
I repeat -The answer to the question - does the Earth keep the same
face to the Sun over an annual orbit or changes it through 360
degrees,the answer is the latter ,a correct intepretation of the
images from Uranus supplies it along with the unequal length of the
natural noon cycles.Beyond is the sprawling climatological
consequences of incorporating the new motion attached to orbital
dynamics.
You carry on with your observational or magnification exercise and
stay clear of the sequence of images from Uranus,to misinterpret the
motions or rather not recognise how it applies to the Earth is
forgivable but this is an indulgence based on recognition of a poor
intuitive intelligence than any mastery of the subject material.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Something new
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: Something new
- References:
- Something new
- From: oriel36
- Re: Something new
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: Something new
- From: oriel36
- Re: Something new
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: Something new
- From: oriel36
- Re: Something new
- From: Quadibloc
- Something new
- Prev by Date: Re: Something new
- Next by Date: Favorite (Educational) Astronomy DVDs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Something new
- Next by thread: Re: Something new
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|