Re: Seeing in the Dark

"AustinMN" <tacooper260@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1190237049.741076.55130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 19, 2:46 pm, oriel36 <geraldkelle...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 19, 8:14 pm, Klaatu <mutster8_nosp...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A Timothy Ferris film on PBS tonighthttp://www.pbs.org/seeinginthedark/

We are astronomers by virtue that our existence is conditioned by the
daily and annual cycles of the Earth,we are good astronomers by giving
those cycles more details.Before people delve into the magnification
exercise that now calls itself 'astronomy' they should at least try to
grasp the axial and orbital motion of our own planet that makes our
existence possible.

Of course,they always misintepret the Mora Luminis of Ole Roemer,the
apparent anomalous motion in Jupiter's satellite Io based on orbital
comparisons between Earth and Jupiter.Because Newton decided that a
hypothetical observer on the Sun replaces orbital comparisons,

Of course, within the context he wrote, he was correct, making
everything else you post rediculous and irrelevant.

Austin


The question remains, why would ANYONE respond, negatively OR positively to
OREO Cream Detritus (or Danny Min, or Nanc.... ARGH!!!), no matter WHAT???

Folks here should NEVER, EVER respond to a known troll, or nutcase, as is
the case here (nor should I, either, other than as this reminder). This is
one of the two or three MOST KNOWN TROLLS AND NUTCASES on this group. So,
by responding to it, you're, at the minimum, part of the PROBLEM...

Remember, whether you agree, disagree, pat him on the back, or try to
verbally castrate him, you are still feeding his ego, because sick minds
like this don't CARE if you yell at him, or agree with him... It's the
attention, positive OR negative that it CRAVES... So ANY kind of response
is giving it EXACTLY what it wants and needs!!!

What's important to a nutcase like this is for you to PAY ATTENTION TO HIM.
ANY ATTENTION, negative OR positive... It's what keeps him HERE... So,
every time you respond to him in ANY way, YOU are helping keep him here...

SO the ONLY response that's acceptable here is TOTAL SILENCE...

ANYTHING else displays a total misunderstanding of the reality of dealing
with this kind of mental basket case...

--
Jan Owen

To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address...
Latitude: 33.6
Longitude: -112.3
http://community.webshots.com/user/janowen21


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Seeing in the Dark
    ... We are astronomers by virtue that our existence is conditioned by the ... daily and annual cycles of the Earth,we are good astronomers by giving ... hypothetical observer on the Sun replaces orbital comparisons, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Seeing in the Dark
    ... We are astronomers by virtue that our existence is conditioned by the ... daily and annual cycles of the Earth,we are good astronomers by giving ... of the 24 hour day,where it comes from and how timekeeping astronomers ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Seeing in the Dark
    ... We are astronomers by virtue that our existence is conditioned by the ... daily and annual cycles of the Earth,we are good astronomers by giving ... of the 24 hour day,where it comes from and how timekeeping astronomers ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: OT: Science class just got easier
    ... Astronomers have to prove their worth and existence, ... silly dreamed up by a geek with nothing else to do causing controversy ... Astronomers don't have to prove their worth to me. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Seeing in the Dark
    ... We are astronomers by virtue that our existence is conditioned by the ... apparent anomalous motion in Jupiter's satellite Io based on orbital ... of the 24 hour day,where it comes from and how timekeeping astronomers ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)