An astronomer's view of mechanics
- From: oriel36 <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:49:19 -0700
The bottleneck which was created in the late 17th century by Flamsteed
first and Newton later spun itself off into a vocabulary all of its
own and still used today -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference
The created bottleneck where no new data can pass productively exists
as a consequence of the work of two individuals yet it can be
presented in terms of absolute space and absolute time of Newton.
Absolute/relative time is simply the false perception that the 'fixed
stars ' provide a means to determine axial and orbital motion and is
the basis for Newton's treatment of Keplerian geometries.
Absolute/relative space is the false approach and resolution of
retrogrades and opposed to Coipernican reasoning,an idiosyncratic
version by Newton which is counter-productive on all counts and has no
precedence in pre-Copernican and heliocentric astronomies.
Many attempts were made to deal with time and space conceptions and
especially by the Germans such as Mach -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach's_principle
For an astronomer with the neccessary intutive intelligence it is
possible to identify the double errors which eluded many people for
centuries and for the most part show how it is possible to re-align
most of the astronomical principles back to 'safe mode'.
The other option is continue on believing in fictional nonsense just
for the sake of it whereas there is an incredible amount of
astronomical data waiting to be processed for
climatological,geological and cosmological avenues.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An astronomer's view of mechanics
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: An astronomer's view of mechanics
- Prev by Date: Re: Famous Astro Hangout closed by JCBH
- Next by Date: Re: Famous Astro Hangout closed by JCBH
- Previous by thread: NYT: Adding an Extra Room for the Sky
- Next by thread: Re: An astronomer's view of mechanics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading