Re: Pining for the LX10
- From: RMOLLISE <rmollise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:38:58 -0000
On Oct 10, 8:56 am, Quadibloc <jsav...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But an inexpensive telescope of this particular type without GO TO was
formerly offered by Meade, the LX10 - and it was on a tripod with a
fork mount. It did have electronic fine motion controls, particularly
in the LX10 Deluxe.
No need to pine...Meade made zillions of 'em and there is always
<http://www.astromart.com>
The LX10 _was_ a nice little scope for the price...I've got eight of
'em at the university and they've done well despite the best efforts
of a decade of undergraduates. ;-)
Unk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pining for the LX10
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: Pining for the LX10
- References:
- Pining for the LX10
- From: Quadibloc
- Pining for the LX10
- Prev by Date: Re: binocular glass number?
- Next by Date: Re: An astronomer's view of mechanics
- Previous by thread: Re: Pining for the LX10
- Next by thread: Re: Pining for the LX10
- Index(es):