Re: Split nuclei not


"Mike Boschat" <aa063@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fg39p2$trk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi:

I saw them in my 6" Maksutov at 60x but was informed
by another observer that it is not a split but:

"There are 2 stars near the nucleus. According to ECU, they are
GSC0333400738, mag 10.9, and GSC0333400788, mag 8.7."

Mike - Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

I think this sounds right, as only one of them looks distinctly non-stellar.
The brightest one and the faintest one do look stellar, and the magnitudes
look right.

Dennis


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Split nuclei not
    ... I saw them in my 6" Maksutov at 60x but was informed ... by another observer that it is not a split but: ... "There are 2 stars near the nucleus. ... the magnitudes look right. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Split nuclei not
    ... I saw them in my 6" Maksutov at 60x but was informed ... by another observer that it is not a split but: ... "There are 2 stars near the nucleus. ... According to ECU, they are GSC0333400738, mag 10.9, and GSC0333400788, mag 8.7." ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Evidence against emission theories
    ... topic involves brightness curves of variable stars and pulsar rate variations ... acceleration towards the observer is maximum. ... If we were to consider a binary where the distance from the observer ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SRs velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
    ... There are thousands of stars that exhibit very constant brightness variation. ... OBVIOUSLY the orbit periods. ... But how do we interpret what we see, Paul? ... >the radial acceleration is towards the observer. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: SRs velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
    ... There are thousands of stars that exhibit very constant brightness variation. ... OBVIOUSLY the orbit periods. ... But how do we interpret what we see, Paul? ... >the radial acceleration is towards the observer. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)