Split nuclei not

From: Mike Boschat <aa063@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:33:51 -0400

Hi:

I saw them in my 6" Maksutov at 60x but was informed
by another observer that it is not a split but:

"There are 2 stars near the nucleus. According to ECU, they are GSC0333400738, mag 10.9, and GSC0333400788, mag 8.7."

Mike - Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Split nuclei not
  - From: Dennis Woos

Prev by Date: Re: Holmes gone double nuclei?
Next by Date: Re: Nucleus split in 17P/Holmes
Previous by thread: Nucleus split in 17P/Holmes
Next by thread: Re: Split nuclei not
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Split nuclei not
... I saw them in my 6" Maksutov at 60x but was informed ... by another observer that it is not a split but: ... "There are 2 stars near the nucleus. ... Dennis ...
(sci.astro.amateur)
Re: Split nuclei not
... I saw them in my 6" Maksutov at 60x but was informed ... by another observer that it is not a split but: ... "There are 2 stars near the nucleus. ... the magnitudes look right. ...
(sci.astro.amateur)
Re: Mg Flash?
... > does the same thing apply to mag based stars? ... I wanted to try a mag ... Many formulae bearing the "mag" moniker often contain magnalium rather than ... straight magnesium. ...
(rec.pyrotechnics)
Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
... that's a big if) Hubble GSC 2.2 is accurate, ... XEPhem with field stars set to mag 30, ... I have stacks of FITS images that show stars ...
(sci.astro.amateur)
Re: Why Seven Pleiades?
... > fainter stars flitting around the fundamental pattern. ... > The 6 brightest stars range quite evenly from mag 2.8 ... separate member of the group. ...
(sci.astro.amateur)