Re: Toronto going for the light pollution award

On Dec 5, 1:31 pm, Chris L Peterson <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:40:34 -0800 (PST), Rich <rander3...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Why don't you take a look at it before you make judgements on it?
There IS not shielding on these things, none of them, that is the
point. They are flush with the sides of buildings.

Maybe you could provide a link to an image? Your rather hysterical post
doesn't inspire confidence in your assessment. Are you sure there is no
shielding?

What I'll do is wait until we have a foggy night, and I'll take a shot
of it, you'll be able to see the "bleed" of light from it.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Toronto going for the light pollution award
    ... There IS not shielding on these things, none of them, that is the ... They are flush with the sides of buildings. ... moisure content in that air so even shielding isn't totally effective. ... well designed lighting. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Toronto going for the light pollution award
    ... There IS not shielding on these things, none of them, that is the ... They are flush with the sides of buildings. ... moisure content in that air so even shielding isn't totally effective. ... well designed lighting. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)