Re: A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- From: Pierre Vandevennne <pierre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:39:53 -0600
"William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:HGOlj.2856
$nK5.2424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Yup, seen that.
Basically Meade also paid the sum of $20.000 to both RC makers. That's the
price of a 12"5 RC, plus a couple of screws and plates. And it ends up in
the pocket of lawyers anyway.
Still, we can now sleep soundly, knowing that the world is a better place
since poor incompetent phantom shoppers such as Mr Azari - who happens to
also be a competent RCOS contractor - won't be mislead, by a single letter,
into spending money for inferior stuff.
Pierre
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- References:
- A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- From: William R. Mattil
- A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- Prev by Date: A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- Next by Date: Meade run around
- Previous by thread: A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- Next by thread: Re: A Meade SCT is *not* an RC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|