Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:57:54 -0700
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:12:26 GMT, Davoud <star@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Damned near impossible. Add air/light pollution to the imponderables.
I wouldn't go that far. I have a fairly simple flux calculator in a
spread*** that does a pretty accurate job of estimating limiting
magnitude for a given sensor, exposure time, sky background, aperture,
and desired S/N. But...
I think that it would be a lot less trouble to measure the magnitude
limit over a number of exposures under ideal skies.
.... you're right, it's easy to measure, and you're going to get the most
realistic idea of your camera's performance that way.
If (and I recognize
that's a big if) Hubble GSC 2.2 is accurate, I have captured mag 21
stars with my Tak 180mm f2.8 astrograph and SBIG STL-11000 from my
suburban location.
That sounds about right. Do you recall what kind of exposure time was
required?
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- From: Davoud
- Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- References:
- CCD sensitivity and resolution
- From: TMA
- Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- From: Davoud
- CCD sensitivity and resolution
- Prev by Date: Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- Next by Date: Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- Previous by thread: Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- Next by thread: Re: CCD sensitivity and resolution
- Index(es):