Re: Agendas
- From: advicegiven <newvariables@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:33:44 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 27, 8:49 pm, ukastronomy <martin_piers_nichol...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yes of course he can "help it" - I worked with people with that
condition all my working life and I promise you nothing is forcing him
to act in this way. He is chosing to do it!
Get over yourself.
You're the one who tells lies all over the web, and promotes
pseudoscience, and uses falses identities like ianhillsmith to attack
people like crinklaw and mollise when they don't agree with you, and
copies stuff from all over for your postings.
One who sets up blogs and mails to lists about how evil and horrible
people are, in secret, without telling them, in the old style of green
crayon letters to the editor. Yet attacks anyone who doesn't agree
with you, often again using your false identities. Many still
archived on lists, although you seem to have become craftier since I
revealed that time that you and your false identities were posting
from the same modem.
Interesting that you always have links to wrong doing, but when your
webpages say something about how you use people's methods, you are
incapable of giving the source url or paper as reference, so people
can check you are doing what was said there.
That you don't tell people that you secretly post files and images to
yahoo groups without telling anyone on the lists, as is normal
practice, via an announce, how you post links to your blogs too at
times.
The testament to you work is how much you've managed to publish in
formal peer reviewed journals, despite many attempts to do so. And
how much of your work is related to what marvellous thing you've done,
rather than related to the topic at hand, and whether it is
interesting.
In fifty years time all "your" stars, double, variables, deepsky
objects, postings, pseudoscience, and the like might still be around
on some ancient webarchiving facility somewhere, but it will not be
known otherwise in any way. Possibly even in ten years time.
However, your emails and attacks, espcially using pseudonyms to agree
with yourself and/or cowardly attack others in a sneaky way, will
exist as long as yahoo groups and usenet groups have online archives,
with the attendant coincident modem IP addresses.
I do not pity people who take your word for things without examining
any science or logged facts, I wonder at them.
Part of my anger towards you at current is that many people, including
myself, have tried to help you with astronomy, have advised you on how
to manage to find all these doubles and variables you wish to become
famous for, somehow. You've never thanked them, nor even replied to
them I have been told, and when you do use their work to manage to
achieve what you had formerly achieved before, never fully credit them
nor reference them.
You are a user who sulks and abuses when he is caught breaking the
rules. For anyone who cares to search the web for lists of postings
by newbinaries or newbinaries@xxxxxxxxxxx, the evidence is clear.
Apparently people are aware of how you behave, but seem somewhat
afraid because of these blog tactics. Don't push it too far, is my
advice. I'm just the least patient of the people who've caught you
lying and cheating, and don't actually worry about the abuse you hand
out. I worry more for the poor souls who give you credence, that is,
the ones I can find who aren't using a BT Broadband account in west
N'ants according to message header IP tracings. Those latter, I tend
to feel, are bound to agree with you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Agendas
- From: ukastronomy
- Re: Agendas
- From: ukastronomy
- Re: Agendas
- Prev by Date: Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- Next by Date: Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- Previous by thread: Re: M83 - Galaxy in Hydra
- Next by thread: Re: Agendas
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|