Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- From: oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:50:09 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 3, 8:33 am, Davoud <s...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ho hum. Lived in the Middle East for about nine years. Enjoyed the
Pyramids, but for the most part one pile of rocks--a ruin that
represented someone's claim to cultural or historical
precedence--looked pretty much like the last pile of rocks and the next
pile of rocks.
Davoud
--
usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
The treasure of the Great Pyramid was not really in any artifacts
inside but the proportions of the structure itself.The removal of the
outer facing stones is almost heartbreaking for somebody who has a
feeling for the ancient people who condensed so much information in
such an economical way.
The few stones remaining showing the angle of inclination as being 51
Deg 50 minutes is an astonishing figure for those who love geometry
but then again none of you seem to like astronomy much less geometry.
25 -30 - 36 - 43.2 - 51.84
1.62 - 3.24 - 6.48 - 12.96 - 25.92 - 51.84
You see ruins, as is your priviledge, but the geometric progressions
from line through circle via the Pi and Phi proportions found in the
Great Pyramid makes it easy for me to see how the great timekeeping
astronomers once came up with the systems that we now use.You get to
impress people with the fashionable and short term commentary of the
people who built the Great Pyramid and their choice of proportions
but they did not build it for people like you who cannot appreciate
it and thank God it will always be so.
.
- References:
- Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- From: Protagonist
- Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- From: Davoud
- Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- From: Protagonist
- Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- From: Davoud
- Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- Prev by Date: Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- Next by Date: Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- Previous by thread: Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- Next by thread: Re: Doomsday Dec 21 2012
- Index(es):