Re: Agendas



The testament to you work is how much you've managed to publish in
formal peer reviewed journals, despite many attempts to do so. And
how much of your work is related to what marvellous thing you've done,
rather than related to the topic at hand, and whether it is
interesting.


It is all too boring to go through the rubbish that gets posted line
by line. So just one example will suffice.

"Minor Planet Electronic Circulars (MPECs) are considered peer-
reviewed publications, and the observers who contribute to MPECs are
to be considered the authors."

Reference:-
http://www.as.arizona.edu:8080/Astro/steward/annrep01/Robert_McMillan.html

Why not have a look at the MPEC's for the following dates

2006 March 11th, March 20th, March 23rd, March 25th, April 1st, April
3rd, April 13th, April 17th, April 21st, April 29th just for starters.

Rather a lot of peer reviewed material in fact. So the truth of the
matter is somewhat different - no surprise there then!
.