Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.



ukastronomy wrote:
I am still not convinced that posting minor variations of the same
material many times to the same group is the best way to get your
ideas accepted.

If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand
and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream
publication is the way to go?

Please explain in detail why this has not been done or if it has been
done what happened.

Thank you.

I'm assuming he feels he has no peers.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... ukastronomy wrote: ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... Nuff saide. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... And thus it is rare that mathematicians are intuitive and that ... men of intuition are mathematicians, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... value inherent in the irony was appreciated. ... Look,I have my own personal sporge flooder following me around and you ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... I am still not convinced that posting minor variations of the same ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)