Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.

On Mar 30, 2:54 pm, "Koolchi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<john.kulczy...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ukastronomy wrote:
I am still not convinced that posting minor variations of the same
material many times to the same group is the best way to get your
ideas accepted.

If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand
and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream
publication is the way to go?

Please explain in detail why this has not been done or if it has been
done what happened.

Thank you.

I'm assuming he feels he has no peers.

Here is what you do - go over to sci.physics.relativity and look at
the discussions about dark matter falling into a black hole or some
other thread and I will tell you that it has about as much substance
as speculating what would happen to the roadrunner if the coyote
caught up with him.These are your peers and if you find comfort in
warped space, multiverses ,dark this and that,time travel and all the
other conceptual junk dumped into the astronomical arena then good for
you.

All I wish to discuss is how variations in daylight and darkness occur
due to the motions and orientation of our planet and that the
variation is due to an orbital component.Most will not get it while a
few most certainly will grasp that treating orbital motion seperately
will lead to a satisfactory conclusion and working principle.


.