Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.

On Mar 30, 12:52 pm, ukastronomy <martin_piers_nichol...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I am still not convinced that posting minor variations of the same
material many times to the same group is the best way to get your
ideas accepted.

If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand
and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream
publication is the way to go?

Please explain in detail why this has not been done or if it has been
done what happened.

Thank you.

It is to be hoped you take your own advice, although the humour value
inherent in the irony was appreciated.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... value inherent in the irony was appreciated. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... Sorry oriel36 but you are still just posting minor variations of the ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... I am still not convinced that posting minor variations of the same ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... value inherent in the irony was appreciated. ... Look,I have my own personal sporge flooder following me around and you ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)