Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- From: ukastronomy <martin_piers_nicholson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sorry oriel36 but you are still just posting minor variations of the
same old material.
If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand
and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream
publication is the way to go? Please explain in detail why this has
not been done or if it has been done what happened.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- From: jerry warner
- Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- From: oriel36
- Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- References:
- Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- From: oriel36
- Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- From: ukastronomy
- Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- From: oriel36
- Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- Prev by Date: Re: Sorry Davoud and John Nichols - you were right.
- Next by Date: Re: Sorry Davoud and John Nichols - you were right.
- Previous by thread: Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- Next by thread: Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|