Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.



ukastronomy wrote:

Sorry oriel36 but you are still just posting minor variations of the
same old material.

If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand
and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream
publication is the way to go? Please explain in detail why this has
not been done or if it has been done what happened.

His goal is not science but anarchy. Nuff saide.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... value inherent in the irony was appreciated. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... inherent in the irony was appreciated. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... Sorry oriel36 but you are still just posting minor variations of the ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... I am still not convinced that posting minor variations of the same ... If the concept is, as you seem to be saying, both easy to understand ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers,amateur or otherwise.
    ... ukastronomy wrote: ... and important then surely peer-reviewed publication in a main-stream ... I'm assuming he feels he has no peers. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)