Re: Before the nonsense breaks out

oriel36 wrote:
On Apr 12, 5:06 pm, Bob Remeaux <b...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

oriel36 wrote:


Nobody stopped to check that you need
the calendar system along with zodiacal geometry to work and while
Newton tried to talk a system of 365 days 5 hours 49 minutes,if axial
rotation is taken as 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds it is 100% certain
that his framework is 3 years/365 days 1 year/366 days - the old Ra/
Dec system applied to the motions of the Earth.

Why do you keep on about leapyears? That's only because the year
(orbital period) is not an exact multiple of the day (axial rotation
period).




.For a star to return to a meridian 3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each
24 hours and without exception requires the calendar system of 3 years/
365 days and 1 year/366 days,For any intelligent person that should be
enough ,despite the belief that the 23 hour 56 minute 04 second value
is a product of 365.24 days,the observations show it to be a
derivative of the 365/366 day calendar system.It is supposed to be a
shocking oversight,error or whatever other way you put it.


Why do you keep talking about leap years?

Are you confusing the matter of leap years with the extra sidereal rotation that the Earth makes during the year?
Yes, there are 366 sidereal days during the 365 day solar year - but that is nothing to do with 1 in 4 years being a leap year
.

Loading