Re: Before the nonsense breaks out

On Apr 12, 8:29 pm, Bob Remeaux <b...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
oriel36 wrote:
On Apr 12, 5:06 pm, Bob Remeaux <b...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

oriel36 wrote:

Nobody stopped to check that you need
the calendar system along with zodiacal geometry  to work and while
Newton tried to talk a system of 365 days 5 hours 49 minutes,if axial
rotation is taken as 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds it is 100% certain
that his framework is 3 years/365 days 1 year/366 days - the old Ra/
Dec system applied to the motions of the Earth.

Why do you keep on about leapyears? That's only because the year
(orbital period) is not an exact multiple of the day (axial rotation
period).

.For a star to return to a meridian 3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each
24 hours and without exception requires the calendar system of 3 years/
365 days and 1 year/366 days,For any intelligent person that should be
enough ,despite the belief that the 23 hour 56 minute 04 second value
is a product of 365.24 days,the observations show it to be a
derivative of the 365/366 day calendar system.It is supposed to be a
shocking oversight,error or whatever other way you put it.

Why do you keep talking about leap years?

Are you confusing the matter of leap years with the extra sidereal
rotation that the Earth makes during the year?
Yes, there are 366 sidereal days during the 365 day solar year - but
that is nothing to do with 1 in 4 years being a leap year- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
.

If a star returns to a location 3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each 24
hours without fail,it requires the 365/366 day calendrical system to
work and it is not possible to base the orbital motion of the Earth on
such a scheme.You can pretend it does but then again,the creationists
or flat Earthers have also great schemes to justify their favored
foundational beliefs.Yours just happems to be astrological in nature.

The intelligent design crowd are correct in one way,there is a
poisoned atmosphere out there where people are terrified that if
their beliefs do not conform with the 'scientific method' agenda they
will become outcast,while the focus is on Darwin/intelligent
design,the core belief is far deeper in the form of the difference
between true astronomical methods and insights and the empirical
version of the same thing.In a way,the responses affirm what most
people already know,the bluff and bluster cannot conceal that the
central theme of the 'scientific method' is anti-faith rather than do
anything productive,at least in the matter of astronomy.

How many here can easily gauige that there are no exceptions to a star
returning 3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each 24 hours thereby affirming
that it does not rely on the annual cycle of 365 days 5 hours 49
minutes but rather on the calendrical extension of 3 years/365 days
and 1year/366 days,a calendrical system that is convenient for civil
puposes but useless for describing orbital motion and structural
astronomy .How many here are aware what happens if they budge from the
fictional 'sidereal time' setup thereby affirming the central theme of
the upcoming intelliegent design/darwin arguments that fear plays as
much a role in the 'scientific method' agenda as does ticking all the
right boxes.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Before the nonsense breaks out
    ... 24 hours and without exception requires the calendar system of 3 years/ ... work and it is not possible to base the orbital motion of the Earth on ... their beliefs do not conform with the 'scientific method' agenda they ... anything productive,at least in the matter of astronomy. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Before the nonsense breaks out
    ... 24 hours and without exception requires the calendar system of 3 years/ ... work and it is not possible to base the orbital motion of the Earth on ... their beliefs do not conform with the 'scientific method' agenda they ... Astronomy is part of my faith,the problem with the anti-faith ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Before the nonsense breaks out
    ... 24 hours and without exception requires the calendar system of 3 years/ ... their beliefs do not conform with the 'scientific method' agenda they ... Astronomy is part of my faith,the problem with the anti-faith ... grasp basic astronomical principles as it was by intelligent design ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Before the nonsense breaks out
    ... 24 hours and without exception requires the calendar system of 3 years/ ... their beliefs do not conform with the 'scientific method' agenda they ... anything productive,at least in the matter of astronomy. ... grasp basic astronomical principles as it was by intelligent design ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Before the nonsense breaks out
    ... 24 hours and without exception requires the calendar system of 3 years/ ... can I reassure you that there is nobody who 'bases' the orbital motion 'on such a scheme' - whatever that might mean. ... we're not the ones who think that something that cannot conform to the 'scientific method' should be included in the 'body of scientific knowledge' ... returning 3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each 24 hours thereby affirming ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
Loading