Re: Before the nonsense breaks out

On Apr 14, 10:27 pm, Bob Remeaux <b...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
oriel36 wrote:
On Apr 14, 7:59 pm, Bob Remeaux <b...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If you are incapable of sustaining your argument it is sheer delusion to
blame it on anyone but yourself. Having no arguments, you squirm and
turn to avoid giving an honest answer to a simple question. Worst of
all, you do the gravest dishonour to the name of the religion you claim
to follow.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No offence but insisting that the Earth rotates through 360 degrees in
23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds is comparable to the insistance of flat
Earthers or 7 day evolutionary creationists,I am not joking,it really
is that catastrophic and there are so many of you.

But since you have not explained *why* you believe this, we need give no
credence to what you write.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No group of people have ever behaved like this,although it is a 100%
geometric certainty that axial rotation through 360 degrees is Not
anywhere close to 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds,it will continue to
be taught as a 'fact' when it is nothing but pure fiction -

.I have indeed explained why if you tie axial rotation directly to the
return of a star 3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each 24 hours that you
end up staring at the calendar system,whatever impediment that exists
in recognising this I find it almost impossible to imagine but there
is no possible way to organise the orbital motion around such a
365/366 day system.

Even in this information saturated era there has to be at least a few
people here who would have an inkling that something terrible must
have happened that the stable core principles which keep clocks in
sync with the axial cycle went astray,I am pointing out exactly where
and when it occured and who adopted the false reasoning.At least
Darwinism has a shade of truth in it whereas Newton's agenda (built on
the solar/sidereal fiction), applied to the work of Copernicus and
Kepler has none.-

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Tiempo_sid%C3%A9reo.en.png

The old commies hated religion or rather they hated the dominance of
denominational religion as an influence over people but they made the
same mistake as the anti-faith empiricist does - faith is a personal
thing,something that exists in the background,not as an ideology but
sometimes the driver of small and great endeavors and sometimes just
there.Anyone who does look into the celestial arena,day or
night ,knows it and although your kind have filled that celestial
arena with exotic and novelistic junk of warped space, time travel
ect as a substitute ,most people now recognise it as such.In
astronomy,the heart is just as important as the head and when I see
those contrived passages of Newton which play on a reader's honest
intention to grasp meaning whereas the intent is confusion then it all
becomes repulsive.It is where empiricism entered astronomy and has
dominated ever since,having neither heart nor head it has eventually
exposed itself as being a cistern for consensus driven
hate ,undisciplined or novelistic reasoning .

In the end it will be teachers teaching kids how Copernicus reasoned
out the axial and orbital motion of the Earth and how clocks are kept
in sync with the axial cycle at 24 hours/360 degrees,things like
that,good things that you have not known.















.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Intellectual Dishonesty
    ... that person is not being honest. ... i would claim that religion is doing nothing but random ... In the case of Lemaitre, I don't think that this is a fair ... string and quantum gravity theories and their apparent compatibility ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: So, what about those Space Cadets then...?
    ... > I thought Johnny Vaughan was quite good and he was certainly sensitive to ... > Overall a missed opportunity, half baked idea quite badly executed. ... I've watched this all week and to be honest it all seemed so badly done - ... they last heart /interest half way through.As Keri said - she's heart ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: BELIEF
    ... what they see as our lack of respect for their religion. ... Honest debating should be about respecting the truth, ... then it is simply a matter of integrity or honesty to ensure that such ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Religion (was: god 0.1.0 released)
    ... What about the non-Judaic practitioners ... If the ten commandments are displayed in a museum, ... and let's really leave room for *anyones* religion. ... time for me to be perfectly honest. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Will the Stargate Channel, er, Sci-Fi Network Edit Who?
    ... You, sir, are either gay or a liar. ... I am hetero and I know in my honest ... heart of hearts that two fellows kissing or making eyes at each other gives ... they tried to sell the line that ideas of beauty are ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)