Re: Galactic images

On 26 Apr, 12:45, R Shiein <rs...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
oriel36 wrote:
Stow it mate,half the people in here would love to escape the junk
dumped into the celestial arena .If somebody wants the 'big bang'
theory where the galaxies have been continuously  flying  apart  while
observationally seeing galaxies collide or interact then the
'expanding space' junk and the reasoning behind it has to go.

You imply that it is argued that the ONLY motion affecting galaxies is
expansion?

It is taught that space has expanded 13 billion light years,the
further we look out the further back in time we are supposed to see.I
had to laugh a few weeks ago on the Bad Astronomy forum where a
curious creationist was playing along with the spiel of expanding
space and many tripping over themselves to explain it to him.He then
asked does that mean that the Universe is 26 billlion light years in
diameter and thereby setting off seizures  the proponents of big bang
geometry to talk abouit something else,it was one of those 'out of the
mouths of babes' type things which can be enjoyed on occasion.

What has this to do with your original post ?

One of the junk concepts is this idea of expanding space  where the
galaxies fly apart yet observations show them interacting like any
other objects do.

I reiterate, you expose yourself as a fool by your arguments.

How about this theory
"Everyone gets older until they die"

Does the presence of a baby invalidate the theory? No - of course not,
because as well as ageing, there are other processes going on.

Similarly, as well as expansion there are other processes going on,
notably gravitational attraction between galaxies in clusters - so
'galaxies in collision' is of no surprise to anyone other than the
bewildered.


I have to laugh at the expanding balloon universe where all the
galaxies have been flying apart for billions of years and the
reasoning behind it -

http://encarta.msn.com/media_461533130/expanding_universe_experiment.html

When people see galaxies interacting and evolving in a normal
way,there is no real need to appeal to a huge sweeping notion of a big
bang conclusion unless you really want to expose yourself as having
very poor judgement to say the least.

I would have to descend to the intellectual level of a flat Earther
to even begin to contend with somebody who envisages a 'expanding
balloon' Universe,others may be fooled into believing that there is
some substance in the reasoning but how they do this while watching
galaxies interact I do not know.




I do not have any attachment to big bang geometry and
the reasoning behind it,so I am free to look at cosmological evolution
from a closer perspective and especially stellar evolution.without
having to make any great sweeping conclusions about how the universe
began or if there are any great structural motions beyond galactic
rotation,things like that.

This pretty well sums up the limitations of your approach. Strange that
you don't see it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I enjoyed how the creationist unwittingly stated that if distance
equals time and cosmologists look acxross 13 billion years of distance
then the Universe must be 26 billion years old in terms of a
diameter.I thought it was priceless even if it was unintentional but
then again,people have shown themselves to have an addiction to a
celestial sphere framework and the reasoning behind it.

Don't be sour,enjoy your 'every-valid-point-is-the-center-of-an-
expanding-Universe',people have been trying to run away from that
notion for going on a millenia as the reasoning of Nicolas of Cusa
shows,the fact that you embrace it speaks for itself.





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Galactic images
    ... theory where the galaxies have been continuously flying apart while ... 'expanding space' junk and the reasoning behind it has to go. ... galaxies interact I do not know. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • The Big Bang Echoes through the Map of the Galaxy
    ... The Big Bang Echoes through the Map of the Galaxy ... In the two widest-ranging exercises on mapping the galaxies carried out ... scientists have made findings that offer serious support for ... phases of the universe to have come down to the present day. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • The Big Bang Echoes through the Map of the Galaxy
    ... The Big Bang Echoes through the Map of the Galaxy ... In the two widest-ranging exercises on mapping the galaxies carried out ... scientists have made findings that offer serious support for ... phases of the universe to have come down to the present day. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Science Disproves Evolution
    ... Doppler effect, that is, stars and galaxies are moving away from Earth, ... system at the time of the Big Bang. ... elements such as hydrogen and helium. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Science Disproves Evolution
    ... The big bang theory, now known to be seriously flawed, was based on ... Doppler effect, that is, stars and galaxies are moving away from Earth, ... other objects of low redshifts. ...
    (talk.religion.misc)