Re: Come on over to Moderated Sci.astro.amateur!




Martin R. Howell wrote:

I just deleted a FEW HUNDRED posts that were older than 30 days and had not
been responded to in more than 30 days.

And you think that this is a Good Thing?

Now mind you, it ain't ever gonna receive the acceptance of hard-boiled and
hard-core usenet folks. That is fine. If you are happy here and don't
care to visit or join Moderated sci.astro.amateur then that is fine too.
Close minded, but fine.

Perhaps you would like to address the fact that you are a single
point of failure, and that posts will be deleted if you get tired
of the project, if you don't like the number of responses, etc.
If I post an answer to a techical question here, it will remain
available for future users. If I post it on your board, it
will be deleted and lost forever.

Just don't be surprised who you run into at the forum.

What will surprize me is if your forum still exists on
01 January 2010.


--
Guy Macon
<http://www.guymacon.com/>

.

Relevant Pages

  • hero embarks Allahdad AL-Megrahis paper
    ... If you'll range Haji's shelter with responses, ... Martin, have a rare lecture. ... but will Mahammed pay that? ... Bill's mayor times in support of our cinema after we travel at once it. ...
    (sci.chem)
  • Re: inProc MessageBox ?
    ... but thanks for your responses. ... escribió en el mensaje ...
    (comp.lang.smalltalk.dolphin)
  • Re: London prices a pain in the pocket
    ... Following up to Martin ... >How many accidents is he indirectly responsible for each years? ... as it was pretty clear from your affronted responses that you are ...
    (rec.travel.europe)
  • Re: Calling Alan Hopes bluff
    ... Martin wrote: ... in our killfiles, that way he would get no responses and might go ... of your New Year resolutions? ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: F2F?
    ... Could I gather from the lack of responses, or people indicating they ... Martin ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.scouting)