Astrokook astronomers and Pluto: Never say die!

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2008-08-05-planet-definiti...

Great 'planet' debate: Scientists could overturn official definition
By Jeanna Bryner, SPACE.com

Top astronomers and other planetary scientists will step into the ring
this month to duke it out over a basic, yet controversial, question:
What is a planet?
"The Great Planet Debate: Science as Process" conference will be held
from Aug. 14-16 at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Md.

Some astronomers see the conference as a way of cleaning up the mess
created by the organization that names celestial bodies, the
International Astronomical Union (IAU), which in August 2006 voted in
a new definition of planet that demoted Pluto to "dwarf
planet." (Under a more recent IAU decision, Pluto and similar objects
are classified as "plutoids.")

Many planet scientists were disgruntled over the 2006 IAU decision,
which they said involved a vote of just 424 astronomers out of some
10,000 professional astronomers around the globe. The most recent
decision, to categorize Pluto and such as plutoids, further ticked off
many astronomers, who felt the term was developed behind closed doors.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: Maryland | Earth | New York | Mike Brown |
SPACE.com | Pluto | Laurel | Museum of Natural History | Caltech |
International Astronomical Union | Ceres | Johns Hopkins University
Applied Physics Laboratory | Hayden Planetarium | Eris | Neil deGrasse
Tyson | Sedna | Planetary Science Institute | Process
"We're going to do something that the IAU did not, which is discuss
what we know about planetary bodies in the solar system and around
other stars, and discuss the value of different ways of defining
objects as planets and what that means," said Mark V. Sykes, director
of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson

When the dust settles, those involved hope a consensus will stand, a
classification scheme for all objects orbiting a star.

"If a new consensus emerges it will easily overturn the IAU. This is
not an issue," said Neil deGrasse Tyson, director of the American
Museum of Natural History's Hayden Planetarium in New York. "If not,
they'll stick with what they've got until something better comes
along."

Tyson said he doesn't see the IAU so much as a separate entity, but as
part of and a reflection of the astronomical community.

Pluto's part

The planet definition saga began, arguably, when Pluto was discovered
in 1930, as this object was an oddball compared with its solar system
buddies in its eccentric orbit and small size and low mass (less
massive than Earth's moon).

The 2004 discovery of Sedna, an object about three-fourths Pluto's
size and about three times as far from the sun, raised some questions
about Pluto's planetary status. Then, in 2005, Caltech's Mike Brown
announced the discovery of 2003 UB313, and bells rang out of a
possible 10th planet in our solar system. The object was round,
orbited the sun, and the kicker — it turned out to be larger than our
then ninth planet, Pluto. Uh-oh.

Since then, the IAU has labeled Pluto a "dwarf planet" and then later,
a "plutoid." But some planetary scientists called foul on the way the
IAU voted in the new planet definition or the outcome. In fact some
vowed to call Pluto a planet despite the most recent IAU ruling.

And so in addition to scientific sessions, the APL conference will
include a Pluto debate between Sykes and Tyson. The debate, Tyson
says, will focus on Pluto with regard to the mountain of new
information being collected about our solar system and others.

"I'm tired," Tyson said. "I've been arguing Pluto for eight years, so
it's another occasion where I'm arguing Pluto. This one happens to be
a little more formal in its construct. So I see it as another day of
just trying to tell people, teach people about, what we now know about
the solar system."

Sykes thinks an object should be considered a planet if it's round and
orbits a star, which is a definition based on physical features of an
object, such as its size and mass. Objects become round when they are
so massive that gravity crushes them into this shape, which is in
hydrostatic equilibrium (a state where forces are balanced so the
object neither implodes nor explodes). His definition would usher in
not just Pluto, but also Ceres (an object in the asteroid belt) and
Eris (the current name for 2003 UB313), as solar system planets.

Based on what has worked in the past for planetary scientists, Tyson
supports the idea of using "observational features" to put an object
on or off the planet list. Such criteria would include distance from
its host star, but it wouldn't include what the planet is made out of.
Particularly with planet-like objects discovered outside of the solar
system, astronomers can't eke out, say, whether the core is made of
iron or another chemical, or whether its surface is rocky or not.

It is hard to know what will transpire at the conference with so many
top thinkers, Tyson said.

"When you bring a lot of creative, talented people together new
solutions can arise that might not have arisen from any one
individual," he told SPACE.com. "The collaboration, the intersection
of ideas, has its own way of creating new understanding."

What to expect

Sykes and others organizing the conference say the most important
aspect of the conference is, well, the conference itself.

"This topic provides the perfect opportunity to teach science as a
process, not a collection of facts," said conference organizer Keith
Noll of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore. "We also
need to stress the importance of incorporating new discoveries to
continually improve our understanding of the diverse objects within
planetary systems."

Hal Weaver, a conference organizer and planetary astronomer at APL
said, "No votes will be taken at this conference to put specific
objects in or out of the family of planets." He added, "But we will
have advocates of the IAU definition and proponents of alternative
definitions presenting their cases."

At the end of the day, though, scientists are looking to come up with
some sort of consensus on the topic of what it means to be a planet.

"There's a lot of emotion, still a lot of room for opinion," Tyson
said, "but it's conferences like this that are hoping to settle the
dust and see what remains standing and see if a consensus can emerge."

If a sensible classification system does emerge, Tyson said, it will
spread throughout the astronomical community.

The best-case scenario in Tyson's view: "Everyone sings 'Kumbaya' at
the end with a brand new classification scheme for everything that
orbits a star. That would be really cool."

His worst-case scenario: "Worst case is that people throw tomatoes at
each other. There's been some fascinating emotion that has arisen over
the past eight years. And I'd be interested to see at what level they
express themselves at this conference."
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sanity returns to astronomy
    ... Pluto no longer a planet, ... Czech Republic -- Leading astronomers declared Thursday ... "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Astronomers struggle to define planet
    ... Astronomers Vote, Johns Hopkins University Takes ... Pluto, the ninth and smallest planet. ... Physics and Astronomy at the Johns Hopkins University's Krieger School ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Pluto not a planet?
    ... article, in that it doesn't just talk about the proposals (badly, in ... A fierce backlash has begun against the decision by astronomers to ... strip Pluto of its status as a planet. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: The Solar System is now down to 8 Planets...
    ... Pluto no longer a planet, ... Czech Republic -- Leading astronomers declared Thursday ... it has held since its discovery in 1930. ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Sky & Telescopes News Bulletin - Aug 27
    ... TINY TELESCOPE FINDS BIG PLANET ... Astronomers Find Lightweight Exoplanet ... The European planet-hunting team led by Michel Mayor (Geneva Observatory, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)