Re: Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- From: Helpful person <rrllff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 24, 7:07 pm, jsav...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Savard)
wrote:
Actually, though, if one uses plastic lenses - an achromatic lens can be
made from acrylic and polycarbonate - they differ enough from regular
glass that one could use acrylic with standard flint and crown to make a
three-element apochromatic lens that doesn't involve any expensive
materials. But the difference between acrylic and glass is much smaller
than that between fluorite and glass, and so if one is building an f/16
apochromat, the argument could run, what's the point?
John Savardhttp://www.quadibloc.com/index.html
Plastic lenses are not practical because of their very poor physical
characteristics such as anisotropy, poor homogeneity and horible
thermal properties.
.
- References:
- Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- From: Rich
- Re: Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- From: John Savard
- Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- Prev by Date: Re: Good news for lefties !
- Next by Date: Re: Roof materials for a portable observatory
- Previous by thread: Re: Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- Next by thread: Re: Still one major hole in telescope offerings
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|