Re: Oriel36 - I am very disappointed!

On Nov 11, 4:56 am, Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote:
Dave Typinski wrote:

Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote:

Quadibloc wrote:

What he has never stated - what he positively *refuses* to state
openly - is just what he thinks the Solar System is doing instead of
what everyone else knows it is doing.

Because he is fixed in his views, and because he positively refuses to
enter into debate concerning the logical consequences of his previous
statements, and he is uncomfortable with mathematics, it is very
difficult to make progress toward either resolving his
misunderstanding, or even to find out precisely what his criticisms of
modern astronomy are.

"Uncomfortable with mathematics"???  Watch this:

Oriel36, please answer one question:  two plus two equals ... what?

Oriel36, what is the sum of two added to Two?

2+2=?

Two plus two equals five for very large values of two.

You aren't Oriel36.   Oriel36 is not only incapable of understanding
the above joke, it isn't even capable of adding two and two.

--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>

This is off-topic but it says more about the empirical cult than
anything else,for one thing I may complain that people are lazy on the
many matters which cripple astronomy but I have no interest in
complaining about the wholesale structure which chains men's minds to
premises and conclusions which are shockingly childish and downright
wild.

Let me give you my answer through Orwell -

"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and
you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make
that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it.
Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of
external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy
of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that
they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be
right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or
that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If
both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if
the mind itself is controllable—what then?" George Orwell narrative

The empirical version applied to astronomy is that the Earth rotates
360 degrees in 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds instead of the correct
24 hour value.The reasoning an ideology which produces the alternative
value I have fought and will continue to fight tooth and nail but this
time by demonstrating the possibilities offered by modern imaging
rather than descending to the level that suits you and your
indoctrinated colleagues.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Oriel36 - I am very disappointed!
    ... modern astronomy are. ... You aren't Oriel36. ... external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. ... the mind itself is controllable=97what then?" ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Tube Audio Question
    ... Hey, Poopikins, make up your mind. ... First you complain that my sentences ... dumbing audio down by making it comprehensible to someone ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)
  • Gravity
    ... As an engineering student in college, I became fascinated by all that I ... seemed to stick in my mind. ... During astronomy I could see the static gravitational ... proportional energy in joules. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gravity
    ... Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy, physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision it all. ... During astronomy I could see the static gravitational sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. ... It dawned on me that space is directly proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was proportional energy in joules. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gravity
    ... Somewhere in all the calculus, chemistry, astronomy, physics and engineering my mind began to wonder and tried to envision it all. ... During astronomy I could see the static gravitational sphere of influence of a theoretical massive object alone in space and the asymptotic nature of the slope of g prime. ... It dawned on me that space is directly proportional to time as one second equaled meters and mass was proportional energy in joules. ...
    (sci.physics)