Re: Oriel36 - I am very disappointed!




oriel36 wrote:

Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote:

Dave Typinski wrote:

Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote:

Quadibloc wrote:

What he has never stated - what he positively *refuses* to state
openly - is just what he thinks the Solar System is doing instead of
what everyone else knows it is doing.

Because he is fixed in his views, and because he positively refuses to
enter into debate concerning the logical consequences of his previous
statements, and he is uncomfortable with mathematics, it is very
difficult to make progress toward either resolving his
misunderstanding, or even to find out precisely what his criticisms of
modern astronomy are.

"Uncomfortable with mathematics"??? =A0Watch this:

Oriel36, please answer one question: =A0two plus two equals ... what?

Oriel36, what is the sum of two added to Two?

2+2=3D?

Two plus two equals five for very large values of two.

You aren't Oriel36. =A0 Oriel36 is not only incapable of understanding
the above joke, it isn't even capable of adding two and two.

--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>

This is off-topic but it says more about the empirical cult than
anything else,for one thing I may complain that people are lazy on the
many matters which cripple astronomy but I have no interest in
complaining about the wholesale structure which chains men's minds to
premises and conclusions which are shockingly childish and downright
wild.

Let me give you my answer through Orwell -

"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and
you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make
that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it.
Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of
external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy
of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that
they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be
right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or
that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If
both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if
the mind itself is controllable=97what then?" George Orwell narrative

The empirical version applied to astronomy is that the Earth rotates
360 degrees in 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds instead of the correct
24 hour value.The reasoning an ideology which produces the alternative
value I have fought and will continue to fight tooth and nail but this
time by demonstrating the possibilities offered by modern imaging
rather than descending to the level that suits you and your
indoctrinated colleagues.

Inability to add two and two noted.

*Think*, people! What sort of entity parses english sentences,
responds with plausible-sounding paragraphs that show no real
reading comprehension, and CANNOT ADD TWO AND TWO? Use your
brains!!

Or you could just ask Eliza...




--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Oriel36 - I am very disappointed!
    ... modern astronomy are. ... anything else,for one thing I may complain that people are lazy on the ... external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. ... the mind itself is controllable—what then?" ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Bring me up to date on SAA, please.
    ... oriel36 wrote: ... people to push back the frontiers in terrestrial exploration.That's ... wrong,and both based on a celestial sphere geometry and I will show ... dumped into the celestial arena under the name of astronomy that ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Appreceating the astronomical Equinox
    ... Oriel36 wrote: ... > of what you do rather than imagine that it is astronomy. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Climate change
    ... oriel36 wrote: ... that's the beauty of science, ... and astronomy. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
Quantcast